lonedesi
07-27 01:49 PM
I live and work in the state which is under jurisdiction of TSC. I got my PERM approval from Atlanta National Processing Center. But for some weird reason, my attorney has mailed my I-140 & I-485 documents to NSC and it reached there today(07/27/07). My understanding is that my applications should have been sent to TSC directly. I am kind of worried now as my application has reached the wrong service center. Has anyone encountered a similar situation? Is there anything I could do now to address this issue? Even if NSC internally transfers the documents to TSC, will my receipt date be considered as the date they received at NSC? Is there any directive or memo from USCIS regarding this issue? Please advise.
wallpaper funny texts in english for 11
zico123
06-27 07:40 PM
is it possible to apply in Delhi even if u r from Mumbai... Has any1 done tht before?
You can easily go to any consulate in India without any problems. but for reassurance you can email and ask the Delhi consulate with details.
You can easily go to any consulate in India without any problems. but for reassurance you can email and ask the Delhi consulate with details.
STAmisha
07-27 07:33 AM
I'm in similar siutation. please message me
2011 t-shirts with funny texts
JazzByTheBay
12-13 05:34 PM
It'd be great to get some more IVians to express their opinions/ideas and vote on this thread:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=205773#post205773
The idea being bounced around is whether IV should be made an organization funded by membership dues, and benefits provided to members only.
The benefits:
- Logistics: Members identified/verified, not anonymous
- Communication: Improved one-to-one communication rather than hunting for information in forums. Perhaps even a newsletter updating you on what's going on, what's being planned, what are the activities.. and action items.
- Funding: Sustainable funding for lobbying efforts, media relations, etc.
- Live Nag-Free! No one asks you what you've contributed in every second post, you don't have to wear the ID tag of your contribution amount around your neck to prevent such questions
- Community: Be part of a community with a national presence, with local chapters.
- Legal advice: Get free legal advice in monthly/quarterly/periodic conf calls/webinars
- Jobs: Job postings or referrals on IV members-only site
- Business opportunities: Come together with other IV members to explore common business opportunities
- Myriad other benefits that memberships in professional organizations come with, such as travel discounts for instance.
The down-side:
- We may lose about half of our "members"
- Others???
Voice your opinions, share your ideas, and vote FOR or AGAINST this proposal here... :
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=205773#post205773
PLEASE DON'T LEAVE COMMENTS ON THIS POST...
cheers!
jazz
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=205773#post205773
The idea being bounced around is whether IV should be made an organization funded by membership dues, and benefits provided to members only.
The benefits:
- Logistics: Members identified/verified, not anonymous
- Communication: Improved one-to-one communication rather than hunting for information in forums. Perhaps even a newsletter updating you on what's going on, what's being planned, what are the activities.. and action items.
- Funding: Sustainable funding for lobbying efforts, media relations, etc.
- Live Nag-Free! No one asks you what you've contributed in every second post, you don't have to wear the ID tag of your contribution amount around your neck to prevent such questions
- Community: Be part of a community with a national presence, with local chapters.
- Legal advice: Get free legal advice in monthly/quarterly/periodic conf calls/webinars
- Jobs: Job postings or referrals on IV members-only site
- Business opportunities: Come together with other IV members to explore common business opportunities
- Myriad other benefits that memberships in professional organizations come with, such as travel discounts for instance.
The down-side:
- We may lose about half of our "members"
- Others???
Voice your opinions, share your ideas, and vote FOR or AGAINST this proposal here... :
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=205773#post205773
PLEASE DON'T LEAVE COMMENTS ON THIS POST...
cheers!
jazz
more...
mallu
10-14 02:28 PM
It is mentioned by many that PD should be current at the time of GC approval. Is that right?
I know people from India who got their GC approved when their PD is not current.
One can check this easily in looking for I-485 approvals to people from India who submitted their applications concurrently in EB2 category after say april 2004. Disregard the cases which got approved in July 2007. Still there are many cases remaining invalidating the 'rule'!
The strict rule is that one's PD needs to be current for approval. But if there aren't earlier PDs available for approval ( say stuck in namecheck ) and if USCIS doesn't want to visa numbers for a year to be wasted , then one can get approved even if PD is not current.
I know people from India who got their GC approved when their PD is not current.
One can check this easily in looking for I-485 approvals to people from India who submitted their applications concurrently in EB2 category after say april 2004. Disregard the cases which got approved in July 2007. Still there are many cases remaining invalidating the 'rule'!
The strict rule is that one's PD needs to be current for approval. But if there aren't earlier PDs available for approval ( say stuck in namecheck ) and if USCIS doesn't want to visa numbers for a year to be wasted , then one can get approved even if PD is not current.
.jpg "www verizon phones hack text")
rjgleason
January 12th, 2005, 11:16 AM
I like it just the way it is Freddy......the emphasis here being the sky and the sunset........your interpretation and it looks great to me.